Global E-commerce

Buy Online

     Lex Traditia




    Lack of knowledge of fund insufficiency upon issuance of check, not liable for BP 22.   There being no
    evidence presented by the prosecution to show that petitioner had knowledge of the insufficiency of his
    funds at the time he issued the check, the second element of the offense was not satisfied. Accordingly,
    having failed to prove all the elements of B.P. Blg. 22, petitioner must, perforce, be acquitted in Criminal
    Case No. 38255-R. The decisions convicting petitioner of violation of B.P. Blg. 22 before the Court of
    Appeals, the RTC and the MTCC are reversed and set aside. (DICO vs. COURT OF APPEALS et al.,
    G.R. No. 141669, February 28, 2005)

    Enter here for complete text.




   Download Supreme Court of the Philippines Jurisprudence here.

   Download Philippine Laws, Issuances and Circulars  here.

BACK TO MAIN PAGE



  EO 52, PD 46, PD 1602, PD 1613, RA 7796, RA 7844, RA 7975, RA 8369, RA 8533, RA 8552, RA 8559, RA 8560, RA 8791, RA 9225, RA 9255,
  AO 01, s. 2002 (PHILCOA), RA 8048

     More downloads added weekly